Comparative Study Application Of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction In Competition Law Between Indonesia And Us Antitrust Law

Case Study: Temasek Holdings and VLCC

Authors

  • Syarah Meiriska Dewi Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Siti Anisah Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v2i1.11

Keywords:

Application Extrateritorrial Jurisdiction, Competition Law, Business Actor

Abstract

The USA as a pioneer has published Antitrust Law since the XIX century. Indonesia also has business competition laws which are regulated in Law No. 5 of 1999. However, the scope of the definition of business actors in Indonesia is still very narrow. It does not strictly regulate the extraterritorial principle in Article 1 paragraph 5 so that there are legal loopholes for business actors who are outside the jurisdiction. However, KPPU has already made decisions on business actors domiciled abroad from the case Temasek Holdings, Ltd. (No. 07/KPPU-L/2007) and VLCC (No. 07/KPPU-L/2004). Problem formulation of this research is: how is the definition of a business actor based on Indonesian law and USA law; and how is the application of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Indonesia law and USA law? The methodology of this research is normative legal research with library research method by tracing secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Data were analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results of this study, there are differences in the understanding of business actors in Law No.5 of 1999 and Antitrust Law. Uncertainty regarding foreign elements in Law No.5 of 1999 makes judges use "Effect Doctrine" and "Single Economy Entity" in categorizing business actors who are outside the jurisdiction of Indonesia. From the existing problems, the Indonesian government should amend the definition of business actors in Law No. 5 of 1999 and provide the principle of extraterritoriality in the duties and powers of the KPPU.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Crane, Daniel. 2011. The Institutional Structure of US Antitrust Law and Policy in Historical Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fabriyanto, Dimas Eko. 2013. Analisis Yuridis mengenai Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan melalui Kepemilikan Saham. Jakarta: FH UI press.

Hansen, Knud et.al., 2002. Undang-Undang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jakarta: Katalis.

Ibrahim, Johnny. 2009. Persaingan Usaha: Filosofi, Teori, dan Implikasi Penerapannya di Indonesia. Jawa Timur: Bayumedia.

Lubis. Andi Fahmi et.al., 2017. Buku Teks Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jakarta: KPPU.

Parthiana, I Wayan. 2002. Perjanjian Internasional. 1st Ed. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Rokan, Mustafa Kamal. 2012. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Usman, Rachmadi. 2013. Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Journals

Abbott, Alden F. (2005). “A Brief Overview Of American Antitrust Law”, Oxford.

Alford, Roger P. (1992-1993) “The Extraterritorial Application of Antitrust Laws: The United States and European Community Approaches”, Notre Dame Law School.

Ali, Mansur Amin Bin. (2017). “Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Negara Berkembang”, Jatiswara, Volume 31, No. 1.

Amalya, Asti Rachma. (2020). “Prinsip Ekstrateritorial Dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, Volume 6, No.1.

Bauer, Joseph P. (2012-2013). “The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act: Do We Really Want to Return to American Banana?”, Notre Dame Law School.

Bukido, Rosdalina and Laila F., (2017). “Peranan Komisi Pengawas Persaiangan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Menegakan UndangUndang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat”, Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, Volume 15, No.01.

Carlton, Dennis W. (2020). “A General Analysis of Exclusionary Conduct and Refusal to Deal – Why Aspen and Kodak are Misguided,” National Bureau of Economic Research.

Colangelo, Anthony J. (2014). “What Is Extraterritorial Jurisdiction”, Cornell L. Review : 1312.

Economides, Nicolas et.al., (2020). “Comments on the DOJ/FTC Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines”, SSRN Electronic Journal.

Fadhilah, Meita. (2019). “Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Kerangka Ekstrateritorial”, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, Volume 3, No.1.

Knebel, Donald E. (2017). “Extraterritorial application of U.S. antitrust laws: principles and responses”, Jindal Global Law Review.

Kristian Hutapea, Kristian. (2018). “Penerapan Prinsip Ekstratertitorial dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Skripsi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.

Lamaj, Jonida. (2017) “The Evolution of Antitrust Law in USA”, European Scientific Journal.

M, Mohebbi, A. (2018). Extraterritorial Jurisdiction based on Effects Doctrine in International Law. Comparative Law Review.

Sabrina, Alifa Nurin. (2020). “Penerapan Prinsip Ekstrateritorialitas terhadap Pengawasan Pengambilalihan Saham dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha”, Jurist-Diction, Volume 3, No. 4.

Sawyer, Laura Phillips. “US Antitrust Law and Policy in Historical Perspective”, (2019).

Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina. (2014). “Antitrust Law: Salah Satu Bentuk Kontrol dalam Upaya Menciptakan Dunia Usaha yang Sehat dan Beradap (Perbandingan Lahirnya Antitrust Law di Amerika dan Indonesia )”, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum QISTI, Volume 9, No.1.

Utami, Putu Devi Yustisia. (2020). “Pengaturan Pendaftaran Badan Usaha Bukan Badan Hukum Melalui Sistem Administrasi Badan Usaha”, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, Volume 6, No.1.

Wifiya. (2014). “Politik Hukum Pembentukan Undang-Undang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat”, Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 8, No.4.

KPPU Decision

Temasek Holdings, L.td No. 07/KPPU-L/2007

Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) through decision No. 07/KPPU-L/2004

Domestic Legislation

Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution regarding the national economy and social welfare

Law No.5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Associations

Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Cipta Kerja

Foreign Legislation

Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 22

Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 & 2

Media Release

Black Law Dictionary, The Law Dictionary, https://thelawdictionary.org/extraterritorial/.

EU Antitrust Fines and the Single Economic Entity Universitetet i Oslo, p. 22. https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/34033/156015.pdf?sequence=4

Miscellaneous

Derizal, Tengku Muhamad et.al., “Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha di Amerika Serikat dan Perbandingannya dengan Indonesia”, Working Paper, UI, 2015.

Zainal, Abdul Latief . “Penggunaan Single Economic Entity Doctrine oleh KPPU dalam Kasus Hak Siar Barclays Premier League (Liga Utama Inggris) Musim 2007-1020”, Skripsi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-19

How to Cite

Meiriska Dewi, S. ., & Anisah, S. (2022). Comparative Study Application Of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction In Competition Law Between Indonesia And Us Antitrust Law: Case Study: Temasek Holdings and VLCC. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v2i1.11

Issue

Section

Copyright Notice