Implementation of narcotics rehabilitation services in mandatory reporting receiving institutions in south kalimantan province: legal and institutional analysis

Authors

  • Darmono Budi Utomo Doctoral Program in Sharia Studies Antasari State Islamic University, Banjarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v6i1.149

Keywords:

Drug rehabilitation; Effectiveness; Mandatory Reporting Recipient Institutions; Policy implementation; South Kalimantan.

Abstract

Drug abuse in Indonesia is a multidimensional problem affecting health, social, and legal aspects, addressed through a rehabilitative approach within the Mandatory Reporting Institutions system. This study aims to analyze the implementation of drug rehabilitation services in South Kalimantan Province, focusing on legal aspects, policy effectiveness, institutional conditions, and existing challenges. Using a normative-empirical (socio-legal) method with a legislative approach and field research at several institutions, the findings show that all Mandatory Reporting Recipient Institutions have strong legal standing and have implemented service standards based on Indonesian National Standard 8807:2022 Type III. These include mandatory reporting mechanisms, assessment procedures, treatment planning, referral systems, and service evaluation. However, policy implementation is considered fairly effective but not yet optimal, particularly in terms of system integration, human resource capacity, and social stigma. Institutionally, although these facilities are formally established, disparities remain in multidisciplinary human resources, infrastructure availability, and digital integration across sectors. Key obstacles include limited expertise, incomplete rehabilitation facilities, suboptimal reporting systems, and persistent community stigma toward rehabilitation services. In conclusion, while implementation generally aligns with the legal framework and operates adequately, further strengthening in integration, institutional capacity, and stigma reduction is necessary to achieve a more effective, holistic, and sustainable rehabilitation system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2022). SNI 8807:2022.

Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Eka Fitriana YSR. (2025). Wawancara Pribadi.

Gunaan, M. H. (2025). Wawancara Pribadi.

Hamdillah. (2024). Wawancara Pribadi.

Henderawaty, R. (2025). Wawancara Pribadi.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-prinsip Hukum Pidana (Revisi). Cahya Atma Pustaka.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Group.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muladi. (2002). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit UNDIP Semarang.

Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Press.

World Health Organization. (2010). The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). WHO Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Utomo, D. B. (2026). Implementation of narcotics rehabilitation services in mandatory reporting receiving institutions in south kalimantan province: legal and institutional analysis. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 6(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v6i1.149

Issue

Section

Copyright Notice