The Principle of Nebis In Idem in Settlement of Civil Cases in Indonesia

Authors

  • Nahdhah Nahdhah Islamic University of Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.39

Keywords:

Nebis in Idem, Dispute Resolution, Civil Case

Abstract

The principle of Nebis in Idem in its application in Indonesia is a fundamental principle because it is related to the requirements of a case claim which this principle can determine whether or not a case may be tried. The mutual lawsuit that was carried out between MS GLOW and PS GLOW is fascinating because there are allegations of filing the same case. The method used in this research is normative research with a case approach based on Medan and Surabaya court decisions. The results of this study are the application of the Nebis In Idem Principle in Indonesia, especially in the MS Glow and PS Glow; in this case, the Medan Commercial Court has yet to decide on the same case. Therefore, the principle of nebis in idem did not apply in this case when it was taken to the Surabaya Commercial Court because the elements in the demands of Article 1917 of the Civil Code were not fulfilled. The legal consequence of the Nebis in Idem principle's enactment is that cases included in these conditions cannot be reclaimed, and these conditions apply cumulatively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Harahap, Y. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. (Cet. 7.). Sinar Grafika.

Journals

Fawaidil Ilmiah, N. H. (2018). Penerapan Asas Ne Bis In Idem Dalam Putusan Perdata (Studi Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3320 K/Pdt/2018). Novum: Jurnal Hukum, In Press-S (ART 1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v0i0.48163

Ibrahim, M. Y. (2014). Implementasi Asas Nebis in Idem Dalam Perkara Yang Telah Memiliki Kekuatan Hukum Tetap Yang Digugat Kembali Dengan Sengketa Obyek Yang Sama Tetapi Dengan Subyek Yang Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmiah FENOMENA, XII(1).

Said, Y. N. I. M. Y. (2021). Metodologi Normatif dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), hlm. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2iI.14.

Zainuddin, A. (2014). Penanganan Perkara yang Berkaitan dengan Azas Ne Bis In Idem. Al-Mizan, 10(1), 140-151.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-06

How to Cite

Nahdhah, N. (2023). The Principle of Nebis In Idem in Settlement of Civil Cases in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 2(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.39

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): October Issue

Section

Copyright Notice

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Nahdhah Nahdhah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Injurlens is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Articles in Injurlens are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License  This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited. Any derivative of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.