A REVIEW ON RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v1i1.7Keywords:
Moral Justice, Social Justice, Philosophy, Law, John RawlsAbstract
Justice is an abstract idea and understanding the core concept of various types of justice will help scholars, lawyers and law enforcement to develop and use the theory for legislative drafting, judicial review, case review, in court defense, and legal research and writing. In this paper we discussed the essence of Rawls Justice, the implication and compared it to other theories of justice. Therefore this paper will focused on examining and reviewing John Rawls idea of Justice and how to implement it in society. The method used in this study is doctrinal legal research. The result of this study while we discussed that the three Rawls principles cannot be realized together because one principle collides with another. Rawls prioritizes that the principle of the equal liberty which is lexically maximized precedes the second and third principles. However we believe Justice as Fairness in action should not mean that there is equality but rather emphasizes the concept of balance for the law in providing justice.
Downloads
References
Asmawi. 2016. Filsafat Hukum Islam. Surabaya: eLKAF Press
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. 1997. Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311.
Chroust, A.H. 1994. The Philosophy of Law of Gustav Radbruch, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, Januari, (1944), PP. 23-45
Friedrich, C.J. 2014. Filsafat Hukum Perspektif Historis, Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusamedia.
Lebacqcz. 2014. Teori-Teori Keadilan. Bandung: Nusa Media
Kelsen, H. 2011. General Theory of Law and State, Bandung: Nusa Media
McGill, F.N. (ed.). 1990. Masterpiece of World Philosophy, New York: Harper CP
Mangesti, Y.A. & Tanya, B.L. 2014. Moralitas Hukum, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing
Nurhayati, Y. 2020. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2020.
Nurhayati, Y. (2013). Perdebatan Antara Metode Normatif Dengan Metode Empirik Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Ditinjau Dari Karakter, Fungsi, dan Tujuan Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Al Adl, Vol. 5, No. 10, P.15
Nurhayati, Y.; Ifrani; M.Y. Said. (2021). Metode Normatif dan Dalam Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 2, No. 1, PP.1-25
Nasution, B.J. 2014. Kajian Filosofis Tentang Konsep Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern, Yustisia, Vol. 3 No.2 May - August (2014).
Radbruch & Dabin. 1950. The Legal Philosophy, New York: Harvard University Press
Rawls, J. 2006. A Theory of Justice, London: Oxford University press
Rawls, J. 1997. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Rahardjo, S. 2012. Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. 2003. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
Tanya, B.L., et.al. 2013. Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi, Yogyakarta: Genta Publising
Taufik, M. 2013. Filsafat John Rawls tentang Teori Keadilan, Jurnal Mukaddimah, Vol.19, No. 1, PP.41-63
The Editors of EB, Amy Tikkanen, and Grace Young, “Gustav Radbruch: German Jurist”, Encyclopaedia Britannica, available online on Encyclopaedia Britannica Website at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gustav-Radbruch#info-article-history, last access on 10 Agustus 2020.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. 2002. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26, 3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 M.Yasir Said, Yati Nurhayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Injurlens is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Articles in Injurlens are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited. Any derivative of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.