Statement of Expert in Holding Special Cases at the Investigation Stage Based on Perkap 6 of 2019 Concerning Investigation of Criminal Acts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.72Keywords:
Keywords: expert; case title ; investigation ; criminal actAbstract
As a form of implementation as a rule of law state, law enforcement officers consisting of police, prosecutors, judges and lawyers are presented to carry out this function. The police as one of the law enforcers carry out security measures in the community, in every action they are subject to formal law, namely the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). In the Criminal Procedure Code, the task of the police to disclose a crime or also called a crime is known as an investigation. In the investigation stage which aims to make light of a crime and find the suspect by collecting evidence, of course, must go through the correct and accountable procedures. A little wrong in carrying out the procedure, the investigator as a user in the investigation in his actions makes it clear that the crime must collect evidence that can really be tested in quality. In the Criminal Procedure Code, evidence is contained in Article 184 paragraph (1) which consists of witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions and statements of the accused. As for the evidence that is in the spotlight in the expert's statement, where the expert's statement is evidence that is felt to play a significant role in determining the elements of the crime which in the end can shed light on the crime in the investigation stage. KUHAP as the holy book of criminal law practitioners in enforcing criminal law is certainly expected has all the facilities or in other words can accommodate all the sense of justice for the parties involved in it. As we also know that the Criminal Procedure Code was born in 1981, if we feel that he is already 40 years old, if we equate it with human age, it can be said that he is entering adulthood. The maturity of the KUHAP so far can be marked by the persistence of the Criminal Procedure Code as the basis for law enforcement and justice seekers in criminal cases even though there are patchworks here and there in the form of implementing regulations and in the form of a Supreme Court Circular to provide perfection and fulfill the people's sense of justice.
Downloads
References
A. Karim Nasution. 1985. Legal Problems of Proof in Criminal Processes I, II and III. Jakarta: Without Publisher, p. 136.
Al. Wisnubroto and G. Widiartana. 2005. Reform of the Criminal Procedure Code. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, p. 2.
Anne Safrina et al. Termination of Investigation: Review of Administrative Law and Criminal Procedure Code. 2017. Journal of Law Platform. No. 1. Vol. 29. February, p. 26.
Bernard L. Tanya. 2019. Legal Theory of Orderly Human Strategy across Space and Generations. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, p. 113-114.
Djoko Prakoso. 1987. Legal Remedies Regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code. Jakarta: Indonesian Persada script, p. 21.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2015. Revised Edition of Legal Research. Jakarta: Prenadamedia, p. 83.
R. Soesilo. 1982. Criminal Procedure Code (criminal case settlement procedures according to the Criminal Procedure Code for law enforcers). Bandung ng: PT. Karya Nusantara, p. 19.
Rusley Muhammad. 2007. Contemporary Criminal Procedure Code. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, p. 194.
Trisno Rahardjo. 2011. Criminal Mediation in the Criminal Justice System; A Comparative Study and Its Application in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Litera Book, p. 1.
MK Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Anang Shophan Tornado

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Injurlens is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Articles in Injurlens are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited. Any derivative of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.