The essence of authority and legal certainty of district courts in the execution of equitable consignment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v6i1.157Keywords:
Consignment Execution, Equitable Consignment, Legal Certainty, Nature of Authority.Abstract
The main issue that needs to be emphasized in the background of this study is the potential inconsistency between consignment as a mechanism for releasing debtors from their obligations and the disputable nature of such release prior to creditor acceptance or a court determination. This inconsistency has direct implications for the normative question of whether consignment, particularly at the execution stage by the District Court, fulfills the principles of legal certainty, justice, and balance. This issue logically leads to the focus of the research concerning the nature of the authority and legal certainty of the District Court in the execution of equitable consignment. The research problems addressed in this study are: (1) What is the nature of the authority and legal certainty of the District Court in the execution of equitable consignment?; (2) How does the urgency of the District Court’s authority affect legal certainty in the execution of consignment?; and (3) What is the ideal concept of authority and legal certainty of the District Court in the execution of equitable consignment? This study is a normative juridical legal research with a prescriptive approach. The discussion in this research explains that the nature of the authority and legal certainty of the District Court in the execution of equitable consignment demonstrates that executorial authority must be understood as a combination of normative validity and procedural legitimacy. Furthermore, the urgency of the District Court’s authority in influencing legal certainty in the execution of consignment lies in the fact that normative and institutional uncertainty at the execution stage directly transforms consignment from an instrument of certainty into a source of further uncertainty. Finally, the ideal concept of authority and legal certainty of the District Court in the execution of equitable consignment requires an executorial authority model that is independent, final and binding, effective yet proportional, and not deterministically dependent on external variables, while integrating law enforcement, legal protection, and social justice orientation.
Downloads
References
Adiasih, N., Kirana, G. C., & Rustamovich, E. J. (2024). THE NON-EXECUTABLE CIVIL DECISION: WILL THEY GET LEGAL CERTAINTY? Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 11(3), 505. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v11i3.40154
Daim, N. A., Bayuaji, R., & Abadi, S. (2024). Criminalizing Non-Compliance with Civil Execution Orders: A Strategy for Enhancing Legal Certainty and Business Efficiency. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 13(2), 337. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.337-364
Fajar, M., & Yulianto, A. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
Gayo, A. A. (2022). PROBLEMATIK PROSES EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PERDATA DI INDONESIA DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN COURT EXCELLENCE. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De JureJure, 22(4). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.000-000
Herliana, H. (2024). Ensuring Certainty through Legal Reasoning: What Can Indonesia Learn from the United Kingdom and the Unites States? Jurnal Jurisprudence, 318–338. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i2.3057
Ibrahim, J. (2017). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayu Media.
Joesoef, I. E. (2021). REKONSTRUKSI PENCABUTAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN KONSINYASI DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.50.3.2021.318-330
Kadir, A., Gunarto, G., Suwarno, S., & Kabir, M. A. (2025). Judicial Power and Judges’ Status in Indonesia’s Constitutional Framework. Jurnal Hukum, 41(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i1.45197
Karyudi, B. M., & Firdausiah, N. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI SUPREMASI HUKUM DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUMDI INDONESIA. Lex Et Lustitia, 1(1), 18–25.
Kustiani, L., Slamet, S. R., Olivia, F., & Arianto, H. (2025). Konsinyasi Ganti Rugi Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Terkait Adanya Sengketa Kepemilikan. Lex Jurnalica, 22(1), 46–52.
Lawalata, S. H., Matuankotta, J. K., & Uktolseja, N. (2021). Konsinyasi/Penitipan Uang Sebagai Bentuk Ganti Rugi Atas Pengalihan Hak Tanah. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 1(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v1i1.481
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum (6th ed.). Kencana.
Maya, A., Zahara, W. R., Mursalin, Al, M. Z., & Wulandari. (2025). Implementation of the Principles of Legal Certainty and Accuracy in State Administrative Decisions within the Police Environment: Case Study of the Bengkulu Regional Police. LUTUR Law Journal, 6(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.30598/lutur.v6i2.22734
Mulya, V. F., Ningrum, L. S., Rafdianto, R., Ramadhani, P. A., & Farahdinny Siswajanty. (2025). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penundaan Eksekusi Putusan Hakim dalam Peradilan Perdata. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v9i2.29730
Muslimah, A., & Widodo, S. (2025). Urgensi Penerapan Contempt of Court Terhadap Pihak yang Menghambat Eksekusi Perdata. Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Multidisiplin (JURKIM), 5(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.31849/jurkim.v5i2.24374
Nabila, S. H. (2023). Peran Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Hapusnya Perikatan Dengan Cara Penawaran Pembayaran Tunai Diikuti Dengan Penitipan Dan Penyimpanan. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 3(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v3i1.1581
Noho, M. D. H., Sari, E., Fitria, N., & Akbar, M. F. (2024). PENGAKTUALISASIAN ITIKAD BAIK DALAM MENCAPAI HUKUM KONTRAK YANG PROGRESIF DI INDONESIA. Progressive Law and Society; Vol 1, No 2 (2023)DO - 10.14710/Pls.22898.
Pratama, K., & Wibawa, K. C. S. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Terkait Pemberian Ganti Kerugian Melalui Konsinyasi. Notarius, 18(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v18i1.56976
Ramadhan, S., Pradana, V. G., Latifiani, D., & Yustina Dhian Novita. (2025). The Transformation of Civil Judgment Execution Toward Court Excellence in Indonesia. Law and Justice, 10(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v10i1.3660
Salsabila, N. E., & Harjono, H. (2024). STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KONSINYASI DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM DI PENGADILAN NEGERI BOYOLALI. Verstek, 12(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v12i2.82909
Stevani, F. A., Silalahi, R. P., Pridehan, S., Maharani, V., & Surahmad S. (2024). Konsep kewajiban dalam hukum perikatan: Teori dan penerapannya dalam hukum kontrak. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(4), 972–979. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14448173
Utari, P., & Widya Saputri, G. P. (2024). Fungsi Asas Legalitas dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman untuk Melakukan Penemuan Hukum. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 5(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v5i1.3603
Wagiran, D. R. P., Maramis, R. A., & Somdakh, J. (2023). Sengketa Pengadaan Tanah Tanpa Konsinyasi Melalui Pengadilan Negeri. 3(3), 6103–6110. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/2207%0A
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Alfi Sahrin Usup, Merry E. Kalalo, Wulanmas A. P. G. Frederik, Jemmy Sondakh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Injurlens is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Articles in Injurlens are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA License This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited. Any derivative of the original must be distributed under the same license as the original.
